Pupil Premium
2023/2024
Strategic Plan for PPG 2023/2024
Please click this link to see the PPG Strategy Statement for 2023/2024
2022/2023
Impact 2023 - Year 6 test results PPG/Non-PPG
|
|
Reading |
Maths |
Writing |
RWM Combined |
|
Meads |
72% |
56% |
44% |
32% |
|
National |
60% |
59% |
58% |
44% |
|
Difference |
+12% |
-3% |
-14% |
-12% |
At National level, 60% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
At The Meads, 72% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
The Meads is +12% compared to the National results.
At National level, 59% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
At The Meads, 56% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
The Meads is -3% compared to the National results.
At National level, 58% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Writing.
At The Meads, 44% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above.
The Meads is -14% compared to the National results.
At National level, 44% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths & Writing.
At The Meads, 32% of Disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths and Writing.
The Meads is -12% compared to the National results.
KS2 EXS+ Non-PPG
|
|
Reading |
Maths |
Writing |
RWM Combined |
|
Meads |
79% |
76% |
78% |
60% |
|
National |
78% |
77% |
79% |
66% |
|
Difference |
+1% |
-1% |
-1`% |
-6% |
At National level, 78% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
At The Meads, 79% of Non-PPG Children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
The Meads is +1% compared to the National results.
At National level, 79% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
At The Meads, 78% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
The Meads is -1% compared to the National results.
At National level, 77% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Writing.
At The Meads, 76% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Writing.
The Meads is -1% compared to the National results
At National level, 66% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths and Writing.
At The Meads, 60% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths and Writing.
The Meads is -6% compared to the National results.
---------------------------------
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading is -18%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading is -7%
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Maths is -20%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Maths is -22%
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Writing is -19%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Writing is -32%
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading, Maths and Writing is -22%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading, Maths and Writing is -28%
Strategic Plan for PPG 2022/2023
Please click this link to see the PPG Strategic Plan for 2022/2023
Number of pupils and pupil premium grant (PPG) received 2022/2023
| Amount | Number of Pupils | Amount per pupil | |
| Pupil Premium | £232,680 | 168 | £1,385 |
| Service | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LAC (post LAC) | £16,870 | 7 | £2,410 |
| Total | £249,550 | 175 | N/A |
2021/2022
Impact 2022 - Year 6 test results PPG/Non-PPG
KS2 EXS+ PPG
| Reading | Maths | Writing | RMW Combined | |
| Meads | 69% | 66% | 63% | 60% |
| National | 62% | 56% | 55% | 43% |
| Plus 7% | Plus 10% |
Plus 8% |
Plus 17% |
At National level, 62% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
At The Meads, 69% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
The Meads is +7% compared to the National results.
At National level, 56% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
At The Meads, 66% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
The Meads is +10% compared to the National results.
At National level, 55% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Writing.
At The Meads, 63% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above.
The Meads is +8% compared to the National results.
At National level, 43% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths & Writing.
At The Meads, 60% of Disadvantaged children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths and Writing.
The Meads is +17% compared to the National results.
KS2 EXS+ Non-PPG
| Reading | Maths | Writing | RMW Combined | |
| Meads | 83% | 87% | 83% | 75% |
| National | 80% | 78% | 75% | 65% |
| Plus 3% | Plus 9% | Plus 8% | Plus 10% |
At National level, 80% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
At The Meads, 83% of Non-PPG Children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading.
The Meads is +3% compared to the National results.
At National level, 78% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
At The Meads, 87% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Maths.
The Meads is +9% compared to the National results.
At National level, 75% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Writing.
At The Meads, 83% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Writing.
The Meads is +8% compared to the National results
At National level, 65% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths and Writing.
At The Meads, 75% of Non-PPG children achieved Expected standard or above in Reading, Maths and Writing.
The Meads is +10% compared to the National results.
---------------------------------
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading is -18%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading is -14%
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Maths is -22%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Maths is -21%
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Writing is -20%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Writing is -20%
At National level, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading, Maths and Writing is -22%
At The Meads, the difference between PPG and Non-PPG children in Reading, Maths and Writing is -15%
Strategic Plan for PPG 2021/2022
Please click this link to see the PPG Strategic Plan for 2021/2022
Number of pupils and pupil premium grant (PPG) received 2021/2022
| Amount | Number of pupils | Amount per pupil | |
| Pupil Premium | £228,650 | 170 | £1,345 |
| Service | £310 | 1 | £310 |
| LAC (post LAC) | £11,725 | 5 | £2,345 |
| Total | £240,685 | 176 | N/A |
2020/2021
Strategic Plan for PPG: 2020/2021
Please click this link to see the PPG Strategic Plan for 2020/2021
Number of pupils and pupil premium grant (PPG) received 2020/2021
| Amount | Number of pupils | |
| Pupil Premium | £207,130 | 154 |
| Service | £310 | 1 |
| LAC (post LAC) | £9,380 | 4 |
| Total | £216,820 | 159 |
2019/2020
Impact 2020
Year 6 Teacher Assessment 2020
| PPG | ||||||||
| Reading | Maths | Writing | RMW | |||||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| Gds | 5 | 16 | 7 | 22 | 4 | 13 | 3 | 9 |
| Exs | 22 | 68 | 16 | 50 | 22 | 68 | 20 | 63 |
| Exs+ | 27 | 84 | 23 | 72 | 26 | 81 | 23 | 72 |
| Gap Gds | -19 | -2 | -4 | -2 | ||||
| Gap Exs | 28 | -3 | 10 | 4 | ||||
| Gap Exs+ | 9 | -5 | 6 | 2 | ||||
| Non-PPG | ||||||||
| Reading | Maths | Writing | RMW | |||||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| Gds | 19 | 35 | 13 | 24 | 9 | 17 | 6 | 11 |
| Exs | 21 | 40 | 28 | 53 | 31 | 58 | 31 | 59 |
| Exs+ | 40 | 75 | 41 | 77 | 40 | 75 | 37 | 70 |
| Gds | Children who achieved Greater Depth Standard |
| Exs | Children who achieved Expected Standar |
| Exs+ | Children who achieved Expected Standard or above |
| Gap | Difference between Pupil Premium Children's achievement and Non Pupil Premium Children |
Strategic Plan for PPG: 2019/2020
Please click this link to see the PPG Strategic Plan for 2019/2020
Number of pupils and pupil premium grant (PPG) received: 2019/2020
| Amount | Number of Pupils | |
| Pupil Premium | £196,680 | 149 |
| Service | £300 | 1 |
| LAC | £2,300 | 3 |
| Total |
£199,280 |
153 |
2018/2019
Impact 2019
2019 Year 6 Results PPG
| GPS | Reading | Maths | Writing | RMW | ||||||
| Number | Number | Number | Number | Number | ||||||
| Gds | 10 | 42 | 5 | 21 | 8 | 33 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 8.3 |
| Exs | 9 | 37 | 13 | 54 | 11 | 46 | 15 | 63 | 14 | 59 |
| Exs+ | 19 | 79 | 18 | 75 | 19 | 79 | 17 | 71 | 16 | 67 |
| Gap NA | 1 | 2 | 0 | -7 | 2 | |||||
| GapBD | 9 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 1 | |||||
| GapAD | -4 | -8 | -9 | -10 | -12 | |||||
Gap NA = the difference between PPG achievement and National Average
Gap BD=the difference between PPG achievement and Non PPG before disapplication
Gap AD=the difference between PPG achievement and Non PPG after disapplication
The Gap between PPG and Non-PPG is increased after disapplication as no PPG child is disapplied whilst 10 NonPPG children are disapplied .
National Average 2019
| GPS | R | M | W | RMW | |
| % | 78 | 73 | 79 | 78 | 65 |
At national level, 51% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected Standard or Above(EXS+) in Reading, Maths and Writing and 5% of disadvantaged children achieved Above(GDS).
At The Meads, 67% of disadvantaged children achieved Expected Standard or Above in Reading, Maths and writing. 8% of disadvantaged children achieved Above.
At national level, 71 % of Non PPG children (all others) achieved Expected Standard or Above(EXS+) in RMW and 13% of them achieved above the Expected Standard(GDS).
At national level, the gap between PPG and Non PPG is -19%
The gap between Meads PPG and national Non- PPG is -4%
2019 Year 6 Results NonPPG
Before Disapplication
| GPS | R | M | W | RWM | ||||||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| GDS | 24 | 38 | 14 | 22 | 17 | 27 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 6 |
| EXS | 20 | 32 | 30 | 48 | 29 | 46 | 37 | 59 | 38 | 60 |
| EXS+ | 44 | 70 | 44 | 70 | 46 | 73 | 43 | 69 | 42 | 66 |
After Disapplication
| GPS | R | M | W | RWM | ||||||
| Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | Number | % | |
| GDS | 24 | 45 | 14 | 26 | 17 | 32 | 6 | 11 | 4 | 8 |
| EXS | 20 | 38 | 30 | 57 | 29 | 55 | 37 | 70 | 38 | 71 |
| EXS+ | 44 | 83 | 44 | 83 | 46 | 88 | 43 | 81 | 42 | 79 |
| Amount | Number of pupils | |
| Pupil Premium | £212,520 | 161 |
| Post LAC | £2,300 | 1 |
| Service | £300 | 1 |
| LAC | £4,800 | 5 |
| Total | £219,920 | 168 |
2017/2018
Impact 2018
Pupil Premium KS2 Results 2018
| Year 6 SATS results 2017/18 |
Reading | Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling | Mathematics | |||
| All PPG (22) | PPG at test level (21) | All PPG (22) | PPG at test level (21) | All PPG (22) | PPG at test level (21) | |
| National Average 100+ | 75% | 75% | 78% | 78% | 76% | 76% |
| National SS Average | 105 | 105 | 106 | 106 | 104 | 104 |
| PP 100+ | 90.90% | 95.23% | 83.36% | 90.47% | 86.36% | 86.36% |
| PP 110+ | 31.81% | 33.33% | 40.90% | 42.85% | 18.18% | 18.18% |
| PP SS Average | 106.64 | 107.73 | 105.95 | |||
| All Non PPG (37) | Non PPG at test level (34) | All Non PPG (37) | Non PPG at test level (34) | All Non PPG (37) | Non PPG at test level (34) | |
| Non-PP 100+ | 62.16% | 67.64% | 72.97% | 79.41% | 72.97% | 79.41% |
| Non-PP 110+ | 21.62% | 23.53% | 35.13% | 38.23% | 27.03% | 29.41% |
| Non-PP SS Average | 102.5 | 105.35 | 103.79 | |||
| Difference PPG - NPPG 100+ | 28% | 11% | 7% | |||
| Difference PPG - NPPG 110+ | 10% | 5% | -11% | |||
R.W.M Pupil Premium Results 2018
| Year 6 SAT Results - 2017/18 | R, W, M | |
| All PPG (22) | PPG at test level (21) | |
| National Average 100+ | 64% | |
| PPG 100+/EXS+ | 77% | 81% |
| PPG 110+/GDS | 5% | 5% |
| All Non PPG (37) | Non PPG at test level (34) | |
| Non-PPG 100+/EXS+ | 62% | 68% |
| Non-PPG 110+/GDS | 2% | 3% |
| Year 6 (59) | Year 6 at test level (55) | |
| Year 6 100+/EXS+ | 68% | 73% |
| Year 6 110+/GDS | 3% | 4% |
| Difference 110+/GDS | 2% | 1% |
2016/2017
Impact 2017
Pupil Premium Results 2017
| Year 6 SAT results – 2016/17 | Reading | Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling | Mathematics | |||
| All PPG (43) | PPG at test level (41) | All PPG (43) | PPG at test level (41) | All PPG (43) | PPG at test level (42) | |
| National Average 100+ | 72% | 72% | 77% | 77% | 75% | 75% |
| National SS Average | 104 | 104 | 106 | 106 | 104 | 104 |
| PP 100+ | 58% | 61% | 60% | 63% | 77% | 79% |
| PP SS Average | 102 | 102 | 104 | 104 | 105 | 105 |
| All Non PPG | Non PPG at test level | All Non PPG | Non PPG at test level | All Non PPG | Non PPG at test level | |
| Non-PP 100+ | 49% | 55% | 68% | 76% | 66% | 74% |
| Non-PP SS Average | 101 | 101 | 106 | 106 | 103 | 103 |
| PP achieving target or better | 47% | 49% | - | - | 77% | 79% |
| Non-PP achieving target or better | 40% | 45% | - | - | 60% | 67% |
| Difference PP NPP | 6% | -13% | 5% | |||
| Reading, Writing, Maths | Reading | Writing | Maths | |||||
| Expected + | High | Expected + | High | Expected + | High | Expected + | High | |
| PPG | 63% | 11% | 63% | 21% | 76% | 16% | 79% | 24% |
| Non-PPG | 40% | 6% | 46% | 13% | 65% | 19% | 67% | 17% |
Measuring the impact of PPG spending
The school’s evaluation of its own performance is rigorous. Tracking of progress over time for each pupil is thorough, and so we can quickly identify any dips and develop sensible strategies and interventions to promote improvement.
• A wide range of data is used – achievement data, pupils’ work, observations, learning walks, case studies, and staff, parent and pupil voice
• Assessment Data is collected half-termly/termly so that the impact of interventions can be monitored regularly
• Assessments are closely moderated to ensure they are accurate
• Teaching staff and support staff attend and contribute to pupil progress meetings each term and the identification of children is reviewed
• Regular feedback about performance is given to children and parents
• Interventions are adapted or changed if they are not working
• A designated member of the SLT maintains an overview of pupil premium spending
• A governor works closely with the pupil premium team
We will use Raise Online, KS2 KS1, Phonics, EYFS as well as whole school data (using Classroom Monitor) to evaluate impact in terms of attainment and progress.
The school evaluated the impact on each pupil at the end of the summer term. Evaluation focused on academic gains and how pupils' self-confidence and well-being developed as a consequence of the intervention/support, as well as their engagement with wider school life. Progress in literacy and mathematics for those year 6 pupils benefiting from the 'Achievement for All' and 'Assertive Mentoring' programmes in particular was outstanding overall. Across the school, all pupils made progress and participation in the wider life of the school increased, as measured through attendance at after school clubs and events; this support will form part of next year's provision.
ALL teaching staff and support staff are involved in analysis of data and identification of pupils and are aware of who pupil premium and vulnerable children are. ALL pupil premium children benefit from the funding, not just those who are underperforming with underachievement at all levels being targeted (not just lower attaining pupils).
